|
Post by WWaS? on Dec 3, 2015 19:14:01 GMT -5
Should we replace him, or no?
I was going to write up a long message about inactive owners, but really, it's just Philly that has ignored several requests to participate more.
This is a league decision to make, so I would appreciate everyone commenting on this. If you don't want to do it here, please feel free to email Colin or I with your thoughts.
FYI: I say yes, replace him. Thanks to another owner, we have someone willing to step in and hopefully breathe some life into what is actually a pretty good team.
|
|
|
Post by silvertips on Dec 3, 2015 20:18:40 GMT -5
Replace him. That's my vote.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 3, 2015 20:22:28 GMT -5
I concur with Silvertips. Nice guy but he's blown too many chances already.
|
|
|
Post by Abe Lincoln on Dec 3, 2015 20:33:25 GMT -5
Has never responded to one of my messages. Have to vote to look for a more active owner. The great thing about this league is the activity.
|
|
|
Post by Reid (FBWO) on Dec 3, 2015 20:46:39 GMT -5
Yup, I'm cool with a new owner coming in.
|
|
|
Post by Carebears on Dec 3, 2015 21:21:56 GMT -5
Laces out
|
|
|
Post by thewelt15 on Dec 4, 2015 0:28:37 GMT -5
Well here is some active owners! 7 votes in 5 hours.
My vote is to replace him.
|
|
|
Post by Roto P on Dec 4, 2015 9:04:25 GMT -5
Since this question was posted yesterday my desire was to reflect on the participation level of Philly. To get a better view I brought up transactions for the 2015 season. This did not include lineup changes but adding or dropping players (multiple add drops count as one).
April 4 May 2 June 3 July 0 Aug 1 Sept 2 Oct 2
On November 9th he did decline a trade proposal.
Now maybe his team was healthier during the season than mine but to date I have not seen him on the site this off season. If we have a replacement that will actually visit the site at least once a week during the off season and respond to messages my vote would be to move on.
|
|
|
Post by Reid (FBWO) on Dec 4, 2015 9:13:33 GMT -5
He was last on here in September according to his profile.
|
|
|
Post by noctorin on Dec 4, 2015 15:49:13 GMT -5
Up to you all, if he is replaced, I am no longer the new guy!!!!!!!!!!
|
|
|
Post by Thunder Choppers on Dec 6, 2015 20:20:04 GMT -5
Based on his inactivity I would have to vote to replace him, it always hurts leagues when teams fall behind because of inattentive owners
|
|
|
Post by Reid (FBWO) on Dec 7, 2015 10:05:14 GMT -5
That's 10 of 10 with 4 left to answer.
|
|
|
Post by Terry Ryan on Dec 7, 2015 15:15:28 GMT -5
If you are still looking for opinions still, I am okay with replacing him. I would like to hear his side of it, but if he does not on, that is kind of a moot point.
|
|
|
Post by WWaS? on Dec 7, 2015 21:05:49 GMT -5
Ok, obviously we have overwhelming support to remove Philly from his team. I asked Colin (SDLC) to come and give his two cents on the subject, but he hasn't yet, and I think it's important we move forward asap. I know SDLC was not in favor of the idea - he believes an owner should only be removed if they truly abandon their team. Philly may not have done that, but he repeatedly ignored requests to be an active participant in our league. Those that were here know that Liquor for Breakfast was removed from his team, and he set his lineup daily. He chose not to be active on the proboards site, and was replaced. I have contacted a possible replacement and hopefully we have someone in place before our first-year player draft.
Thank you for helping with this decision.
|
|
|
Post by San Diego Laser Cats on Dec 7, 2015 22:55:20 GMT -5
Had the in-laws in town this weekend, just getting to things now.
Everyone seems to be in agreement, and I'm not seeing Philly turn up to defend himself. I think that's worth noting.
|
|